Public Comment for the MD 28, Norbeck Road, and MD 198, Spencerville Road/Sandy Spring Road project AW068_11 (was MO886_11)

Please submit a public comment about MD-198 by July 19th!

Here's my message -- thanks Sebastian for producing a template that made it easier to put these items together.  


To: jbeck@sha.state.md.us
Cc: eric.luedtke@house.state.md.us, Tom.Hucker@montgomerycountymd.gov, craig.zucker@senate.state.md.us

Dear Mr Beck,

As a regular user of MD 198, I am pleased to see progress at making this road safer for bicyclists, pedestrians, and drivers. That being said, there is room for improvement.

I have been a long time resident of Burtonsville and have been a strong supporter of rebuilding this community into a destination via my participation in the design of the Burtonsville Crossroads Neighborhood Plan and continuing work through the Maryland Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee (MBPAC) and Montgomery County Bicyclists Advisory Group (MCBAG).   I envision and walkable and bicycle friendly business district with bicycle connections between all surrounding communities and parks.   To make this happen, I urge the State Highway Administration to make the following revisions to the MD 28/198 Corridor Improvement Study.

For all All of MD198/MD28

• I support bike-friendly facilities, in particular, the off- road shared-use path on one side of MD 198 in areas with few driveways or curb cuts.  Areas that currently have a high density of access points should be reconfigured to reduce curb cuts/access.   The path and roadway should be separated by a green space buffer wide enough for tree planting to provide shade. 
• The shared-use path should be wide enough for two directions of bicycles and pedestrian traffic and designed to be as straight as possible and for a reasonable bicycle cruising speed of up to 15-20 miles per hour. 
• Crosswalks should be announced with markings and signage to warn drivers about crossing bicyclists and additional markings should be made where driveways cross the trail, possibly with raised crosswalks to slow drivers and raise awareness to trail users. 
• High-speed, right- turn slip lanes that turn across the trail should be reconfigured to slow down turning vehicles and improve visibility of cyclists and pedestrians.

Critical recommendations for SHA Project Management Division, Segment D (Burtonsville):

• Comply with the Burtonsville Crossroads Neighborhood Plan by providing a landscaped median with breaks to establish a grid of local streets, enhance safety, and improve access to businesses.  This would look more like the Alt-3 Access Management Profile.  
• Lanes should be narrowed from 11 ft to 10 feet to discourage speeding and bring a more residential/commercial quality to the business district.
• In addition to lane with reductions, speed limit through Burtonsville Business District should be set to a maximum of 25 mph.
• Overhead utilities should be cleaned up and buried.
• Widen grass buffers between sidewalks and road to 6 ft to allow streetscaping.
• Widen bike lanes to 5 ft and add 2 ft buffer from travel lanes to improve safety.
• Add traffic circles at Old US-29 and MD-198 and at Old Columbia Pike (diagonal intersection) and MD-198.  This will facilitate those who need to make U-Turns since left turns will be essentially eliminated through the Business District with the exception of a traffic light at the Burtonsville Town Square intersection.

Critical recommendations for SHA Project Management Division, Segment E (West Laurel):

• Add second turn lane from McKnew Road to MD 198 or add a signalized intersection at Cedar Tree to relieve the aggressive behavior people exhibit when attempting to leave the community.  
• Drivers leaving McKnew Rd to MD-198 should not have any turns while MD-198 through traffic is green.  The limited visibility and speed of traffic in this segment makes even right-on-red dangerous.   Additionally, a bicyclist on the shoulder has no bailout area due to the volume and speed of traffic which is a problem when vehicles routinely make continuous right-hand-turns on red (without a stop). Even with a stop, the vehicles are pulling well into the bicyclists useable shoulder area. 
• The MD-198/McKnew intersection should be completely controlled, including left turns with red-arrows from MD-198 to McKnew to prevent the frequent collisions that occur today.   

Critical recommendations for the SHA District 3 office include:

• Allocate funding for intersection improvements at MD 198 and Peach Orchard Rd.
• Install traffic signal at Burtonsville Town Square.
• Install speed activated signs in 25 and 30 mph speed zones.
• Provide crosswalks for people to safely cross MD 198 (see Coalition to Fix 198 document for locations).

Critical recommendations for Montgomery County include:

• Install gateway landscaping and signage at entrance to Burtonsville retail district.
• Accelerate funding for Burtonsville Access Road.
• Draft amendment to state legislation to clarify applicability of speed cameras.
• Construct sidewalk on McKnew Road to connect to MD 198.
• Extend Sidewalk on North side of MD-198 from 4140 Sandy Spring Rd to McKnew Rd to allow pedestrians a place to walk while not forcing crossings midway.  Also allows safer access to bus stop.

Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the study. I encourage you to review the full report developed by the Coalition to Fix MD 198 (download at: https://goo.gl/LUCzep) for more recommendations.

Sincerely,

Stephen Ashurst




 

Maryland Legislation 2017

I've recently sent an a record amount of letters to my legislators about both worthwhile and horrendous bills.  Here are some of my top subjects:

I supported these bills:

• HB0578 - Vehicle Laws - Pedestrian Hybrid Beacons (cross-filed: SB0338)
• Amendments have jointly been made by Bike Maryland, State Highway Administration and other sponsors to conform to the Federal Highway Administration standards. 
• Almost all motorists (99%) of drivers adhere to these Beacons and 76% of cyclists and pedestrians understand and use them. Pedestrian Hybrid Beacons save lives.
• HB0332 - Montgomery County - Maximum Speed Limits Outside Urban Districts MC 23-17
• This would give Montgomery County the authority to set speed limits as low as 20mph on certain roads outside urban districts.  This will give local engineers another option in their tool bag so they can make certain streets safer.
• HB0997 - Vehicle Laws - Bicycles, Play Vehicles, and Unicycles - Operation on Sidewalks and in Crosswalks
• This would allow bicycles to operate lawfully on sidewalks and in crosswalks.     This bill adds legal protections for bicycles that are at the same level as pedestrians when using sidewalks and crosswalks.
• HB0011 - Vehicle Laws - Causing Diesel Emissions to Discharge Onto Another - Prohibition
• Intentional emissions of diesel exhaust is a menace to cyclists, runners, and drivers. I've personally had a truck do this while driving in Montgomery County.  This dangerous practice should be prohibited.
• Video of this action happening to a cyclist: https://youtu.be/h8k8bhGrXIo

I do not support these bills:

• HB1451 - Left Lane Use for Passing
• This bill only seems to enable and legalize speeding on our roadways. Maryland roadways are severely congested already and even in normal flowing traffic conditions, all lanes must be used, whether passing or not. In order to move all traffic down the road, all lanes must be used. 
• There are many specifics missing from this bill. We don't know how long is "too long" to say in the left lane. As vehicle speeds vary, even while passing, it may be impossible to always continue passing as someone in the right lane speeds up. Also for left exits, there's no rule about how far in advance of the exit we may enter the left lane. For an area, such as MD-32 and I-95, I generally get in the left lane to go from MD-32 E to I-95 N almost 2 miles in advance knowing that if I wait till I'm only one mile or one-half mile from the exit, it may be backed up and I won't be able to merge into the left lane. On roads like US-29 with stop lights and left turns all along it, there's no reason for people to move out of of the left lane, and doing so would only cause chaos as people are concerned with getting tickets for being caught in the left lane for too long. 
• This is a dangerous bill to people's safety while traveling our roads. It will encourage speeding and aggressive driving and likely enable more road rage incidents.
• HB1456 - Vehicle Laws – Passing to the Right – Use of Shoulder
• This bill makes no mention about the safety of pedestrians and bicyclists using the shoulder in a legal manner.   Even completely focused drivers, not to mention distracted drivers, are rarely verifying the shoulder is clear of these vulnerable users before bolting around a vehicle just to save a second or two of time.   This bill endanger these users of the road and shoulder.   Instead of passing this bill, a future bill to require re-engineering of roadways to allow for proper, safe left-turns while keeping a through lane open and preserving the shoulder and perhaps a protected bike lane would be more appropriate.

I encourage you to contact your legislators and get involved with your community and state level issues.

Maryland "Three Foot Law" Amendments Stuck in Committee

Today, I'd like to ask for you to write your Maryland senator and ask them to contact Senator Zirkin so that HB 214 (cross filed as SB 1123) can be moved through Committee.   

More info here: 

• https://www.bikemaryland.org/slow-down-move-over/
• http://mgaleg.maryland.gov/2016RS/bills/sb/sb1123f.pdf
• http://mgaleg.maryland.gov/2016RS/bills/hb/hb0214t.pdf

Find your elected official here: http://mdelect.net/

2016 Bicycle Related Legislation for the State of Maryland

Update on Tue 2016-02-23:

Bike Maryland has posted their information about the following three bills and most notably, I feel that their take on the mandatory use bill (HB426) is more in-line with why I support it.   I absolutely agree that the SHA needs to revamp their bike lane standards, as the current 5ft shoulders we are given are nothing more than a death wish along multi-lane, high speed traffic roads.  The roads managed by SHA need proper protected bike lanes even more than most local roads due to the high volumes and high speeds of motor vehicles.   Please take time to write your delegates to support these bills.

---

Thanks to WABA for keeping me informed of important Maryland State Legislation.  Here's my thoughts and text sent to my legislators with regard to the following bills: HB 214, HB 426, SB 302/HB 864.  http://www.waba.org/blog/2016/02/bike-bills-in-marylands-2016-legislative-session/

I changed out the 3rd paragraph a bit to make it a stronger argument.   If you feel these bills are important to you, you should take a few minutes and send email to your legislators.   Easily done at the WABA link above.   

Here's my text sent, mostly written by WABA except for the 3rd paragraph.

I am a Maryland resident who rides a bike. Bicycling access and safety on our roads are key issues for me. I request that you support laws that create a safety culture that keeps people like me and my family, who choose to get around by bike, safe on the roads.

In particular, I ask you to support HB 214, which removes the "narrow lane" exception from the three foot passing law. Most of the roads in Maryland on which a person would want to ride a bicycle are narrower than 14 feet, making the protections of the passing law close to meaningless. This bill would require vehicles to give three feet when passing on all roads, and bring Maryland in line with the 28 other states that have three foot passing laws without self-defeating exceptions.  Here's some additional information from the NCSL. http://www.ncsl.org/research/transportation/safely-passing-bicyclists.aspx

I also ask you to support HB 426, which would repeal the mandatory use of bicycling infrastructure. Protected bike lanes are a wonderful amenity that encourages folks to ride who might not feel safe doing so otherwise, but it is not prevalent enough to mandate the use of all bike infrastructure in a law.  Many of our so called bike facilities are shoulders with little more than 3 ft and a white line and routinely end abruptly.  Furthermore, they encourage unsafe passing by motor vehicles that do not give 3 ft due to a bike lane being present.      Those who choose to ride bicycles as transportation should not be mandated to ride in this inferior infrastructure until such a time when a complete network of protected/grade separated bicycle infrastructure exists.  

Finally, please support SB 302/HB 864, which creates a cause of action for punitive damages against drunk drivers. Current case law precludes the award of punitive damages to the victim of drunk driving or her family, and we should change that. 

I urge you to support these bills when they leave committee. They will make the roads of Maryland safer for the most vulnerable users. I look forward to following your progress on these issues.

New Page Debut

Unfortunately, today, I'm creating a new page entitled "Poor Decisions".   Mainly, I'm listing uncomfortable moments I've experienced on a bike, especially since these items cannot be acted on by police unless they witness it themselves.

Why don't we have an avenue to report people who are aggressive or distracted?   I can't even report them even when I can positively identify the person, vehicle, time, location, etc.   Additional witnesses, I'm told, won't change the way police operate in Montgomery County MD.

I used to love to commute by bicycle, I used to love to ride in the country, but why am experiencing an almost daily failure for people to make good and safe decisions when they drive.   I would like to enjoy bicycling to work or to the store again.   Please help and drive safely and respectfully around bicycles.  Please contact your local and state representatives and let them know you want protected bike lanes in your community and on your state roads to separate traffic and reduce conflicts between bicycles and motor vehicles.  

Until safe bicycle facilities exist, I'll just add to this page and document my experiences with people who've made poor decisions.

http://www.makeitbikeable.com/p/poor-decisions.html

Montgomery County Bill for Safer Streets (Bill 33-13)

The final reading for Bill 33-13 is scheduled for tomorrow morning.

http://www.montgomerycountymd.gov/council/resources/files/bill/2013/packets/20131210_4c.pdf

This bill:

1. defines target speeds for roads,
2. lane widths,
3. safety improvements,
4. and ultimately commands multi-modal road use.

This bill could be improved, nevertheless:

With the option for alternative standards by the Executive with only a notification, the bill remains weakened.  I would have even more support if the Executive would need approval from the Council before an exception was approved. Additionally, this bill provides for some technical implementation for curb radius build-out, but lacks technical enforcement of the speed.   I would recommend speed humps be included along any commercial suburban/urban zones where the target speeds are 30mph or less.   The demand for slower speeds, in this bill, warrants my full support, even if technical specifications are missing.

I urge you to show your support for this bill.   You can do so easily at: http://salsa3.salsalabs.com/o/2041/p/dia/action3/common/public/?action_KEY=15180

Thank you Councilmember Berliner and Councilmember Riemer for sponsoring this bill.

Update:

http://www6.montgomerycountymd.gov/Apps/Council/PressRelease/PR_detailsnew.asp?PrID=14287

Montgomery County Council Enacts Bill to Redefine Road and Sidewalk Standards Bill Adopts Safe Speed Limits, Makes Communities Safer for Pedestrians and Bicyclists, Particularly in Emerging Urban Areas
 

• Release ID: 14-351
• Release Date: 11/25/2014
• Contact: Neil Greenberger 240-777-7939 or Delphine Harriston240-777-7931
• From: Council Office 

The Montgomery County Council today unanimously enacted Expedited Bill 33-13 that will limit the width of travel lanes, turning lanes and parking lanes, as well as the size of intersection curb radii in urban areas. The bill also will set target speeds at which vehicles should operate in urban business districts to provide mobility for motor vehicles and for a safe environment for pedestrians and bicyclists. Some of the new guidelines are particularly aimed at the emerging urban areas that are developing around various areas of the County.

The bill, which was sponsored by Councilmembers Roger Berliner and Hans Riemer, requires certain road improvements to include a sufficient pedestrian refuge area, directs developers building road improvements to add curb ramps where appropriate and requires curb ramps to be built in accordance with federal American with Disabilities Act (ADA) best practices.

Councilmembers Berliner and Riemer convened a working group of staff from the Council, the County Planning Department, the County Department of Transportation (DOT), the Montgomery Fire and Rescue Service and the Department of Permitting Services. The group met five times in October and November, and was assisted by Toole Design, a planning firm under contract to DOT that has considerable experience in the development of complete streets standards and guidelines.

Among the key aspects of the legislation was to set “maximum target speeds” to provide mobility for motor vehicles and a safe environment for pedestrians and bicyclists. This provision focuses on urban areas, but would not set target speeds in suburban and rural areas. The target speed for all County streets in urban areas would be 25 mph, unless otherwise specified in an adopted master plan or Capital Improvements Program.
"I am proud that the Council has passed a ‘complete streets’ measure that will make our urban nodes safer for all users,” said Councilmember Berliner, who chairs the Council’s Transportation, Infrastructure, Energy and Environment (T and E) Committee. “By narrowing lanes and turns, providing for more pedestrian refuges, and designing roads for lower speeds, we can make sure that our urban areas are places that will attract residents old and young. Our urban rights of way must be made accessible to all users, not just drivers. I look forward to working with the Department of Transportation on regulations that will further this movement toward a complete streets philosophy, a progressive approach to our urban streets."

To help achieve safe speeds, the bill generally limits road lanes to no wider than 10 feet, although the Planning Board or County Executive are given the authority to grant a waiver for improvements by a develop if a 10 foot-wide or 11 foot-wide lane "would significantly impair public safety.” A single traffic lane is generally designed to be 12 feet wide under most current standards.

Although a few County streets have lanes that are narrower, especially for left turns, 10 feet is considered the minimum width that can accommodate general traffic on a through lane. There is less room to maneuver in 10 foot-wide lanes than in the more standard 11-and 12-foot-wide lanes.
"Our residents want and deserve the high quality of life that well designed urban areas can provide, and this legislation will help the County move forward to provide them,” said Councilmember Riemer, who also is a member of the T and E Committee. “We want to create districts where people can walk and bike and feel safe, while cars can still move but the streets are comfortable for all users."

Sections of the law apply to all County roads, including the provision to create separated and buffered bike lanes. Separated bike lanes (also known as cycle tracks) have not been defined in the County Code, although they have been included in at least two recently adopted master plans. The new law defines a bike lane as a bikeway that is separated from motor vehicle travel lanes by a physical barrier, such as a landscape panel or a line of parked cars. It also defines a buffered bike lane as one that is separated from motor vehicle lanes by striped pavement.

The law encourages the building of sidewalks when road projects are developed. The previous law leaves broad discretion to the Council and the Planning Board on whether sidewalks must be installed with a road project. The new law limits that discretion to four situations: in very low density rural zones, along rustic or country roads, where limits on impervious surfaces apply and on tertiary residential streets where the Planning Board finds that a sidewalk is unnecessary. 

                                                                # # # #